- Joined
- Mar 16, 2017
- Messages
- 40
- Likes
- 102
- Degree
- 0
Politics aside, Project Veritas released a new video on a Google whistleblower and they discuss some topics like blacklisted domains from search results, flagged search queries, and some other SEO-related stuff. Check it out here: https://www.projectveritas.com/2019...oes-public-says-burden-lifted-off-of-my-soul/
From that URL there is also a trove of leaked documents from Google, one that I'm currently looking at is their "Realtime Boost" slides which details how that process works (pic related).
Here's a quote from some guy's resume at Google as a part of the "Clicks Team"
If anyone else is checking out these documents, maybe we can share some of the good SEO-related findings in this thread? So far I haven't found anything juicy, just some interesting tidbits.
From that URL there is also a trove of leaked documents from Google, one that I'm currently looking at is their "Realtime Boost" slides which details how that process works (pic related).
Here's a quote from some guy's resume at Google as a part of the "Clicks Team"
I'm the manager for logs-based ranking projects. The team's efforts are currently split
among four areas:
- Navboost. This is already one of Google's strongest ranking signals. Current work is on automation in building new navboost data; recency and anti-grandfathering; and building an improved model of user behavior, taking into account impressions and display bias.
- Generalizing navboost: extending the system to help with (query, document) pairs for which we have no direct evidence.
- Mergeserver and navseek: These are really two sides of the same coin. The former is an experimental framework for comparing user behavior in the presence of changes to ranking or UI; the latter, a system for exploring new results for existing queries.
If anyone else is checking out these documents, maybe we can share some of the good SEO-related findings in this thread? So far I haven't found anything juicy, just some interesting tidbits.