Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it's just got harder and more like real business
What's the alternative if you don't start an online business than?As you say, the overall goal is to either exit for a good amount or have a successful business I can pass down to my daughter.
I'd say DA expired domains. You'll see quicker results if the content is the same niche.In 2024, is it better to Start a new site or buy a small DA-expired domain and start building over it?
Is time the only advantage?
Use the AI to build something unique and cool that people will like and want to spend their money on. Or, use the AI to mass produce cheap crap for a quick buck while it lasts.In the age of AI what would be the best way to make money online or make money in the online marketing field?
Hi all,
Here's my dumb question. After the seo update in March, is it still worth it to build affiliate websites anymore? I've no idea whats going on, some people say Google created that update to make more money. Is that true? :')
This is why so many people are upset with these former SEO course sellers who have pivoted on a dime to selling "get rich with an AI blog geared towards Pinterest" courses. Not only does it still put all your eggs in 1 basket, but they aren't even being honest about the sheer amount of money they had to spend to make their blogs profitable in such a short time.If you're seasoned, have contacts, right connections, have funds, then you can get it down to 6 months to a year.
Websites weren't meant to only have one traffic source. It's just the SEOs came alone and gaslighted everyone into "easy traffic - easy money", and it WAS easy, until it wasn't.
https://yoursite/com/wp-content/upload/2024/01/This-Is-A-Image-Name.webp
?No, there's no reason to index it. Yes, the reason to not index it is that it's "thin content". There's nothing on the page but your image embedded in your navigation, footer, and sidebar.Q1. Would there ever be a reason to index this?
Q2. Would there ever be a reason to not index this?
Thank you. This was my current setting. And they are all showing up as "crawled - currently not indexed" in GSC so I just wanted to get a head check.No, there's no reason to index it. Yes, the reason to not index it is that it's "thin content". There's nothing on the page but your image embedded in your navigation, footer, and sidebar.
A fun story is that Yoast has a setting to redirect these to the page the image is embedded on. And during one update they screwed up and set the setting to be "off" for everyone, and tons of site's suddenly were having zillions of new pages indexed, losing traffic, and running into Panda problems. Yoast did turn around and fix it ASAP and even set up sitemaps to help speed up the process.
But that was a real world example of why you don't want to index these.
Actually, I misspoke (I just crawled out of bed, head isn't working yet). I was referring to "attachment pages" or "media pages" for media of various types on Wordpress, including images. You're referring to the actual URL the image lives on (not the "attachment page", which Wordpress shouldn't even generate, it's nonsense).Thank you. This was my current setting. And they are all showing up as "crawled - currently not indexed" in GSC so I just wanted to get a head check.
yoursite.com/category/post-slug/attachment/3/
.Thank you for following up on this and clarifying.Actually, I misspoke (I just crawled out of bed, head isn't working yet). I was referring to "attachment pages" or "media pages" for media of various types on Wordpress, including images. You're referring to the actual URL the image lives on (not the "attachment page", which Wordpress shouldn't even generate, it's nonsense).
These are likeyoursite.com/category/post-slug/attachment/3/
.
What you shared is a direct link to a URL where it's hosted on the server within the file structure. I don't think Wordpress sends any HTML Headers with the response to say no-index or anything. I think Google simply understands "this is an image file with no other HTML around it, we don't index this as a web page, but we do as an image." So it should be "crawled - not indexed" in your list of Page Indexing in Search Console. The reasoning for this is similar. There's nothing there, it's thin content. Not all images will show up, but some will. I'm looking at some in mine right now. It's as it should be.