- Joined
- Jan 13, 2024
- Messages
- 236
- Likes
- 205
- Degree
- 1
Sam Altman makes a good point. You need to bet that the algorithms development will jump ahead in leaps and bounds. This is for Google or open ai. The next Google update is going to be even worse.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The next Google update is going to be even worse.
Here's what I think is going to happen in 5 core updates. When someone searches for "best air fryer" it won't be an informational query but treated as a transactional query. They're not looking for air fryer reviews but looking to buy the best air fryer on the market. Then Google's LLM will generate text telling the user what air fryer to buy, based upon the spider reading user reviews of air fryers on e-comm sites. Then the LLM gives the user Google's affiliate link for that air fryer on an e comm site or links to that air fryer being sold on Google Ads. Informational queries will be a thing of the past.This Google update was about links and anchor text, as they all were.
You guys are mixing dooms day scenarios.
A.I. isn't even intelligence, it's us better interfacing with the computer. It's like the invention of the mouse, now we aren't keyboard dependent. Did the mouse kill computer? No but it did liberate us from the keyboard quick significantly.
Then touchscreen liberated us from sitting down in front of a computer to get work done, we can write and work using our mobile now.
All "A.I." is allowing us to do is organize the data already there - better, and give us a better interface with it. We can "talk" to the computer now, ask questions, and it will give us answers based off of datasets it has within it.
It's not alive. It's ran by humans. It's just the next dawn of the next interfacing with computers. You still need to have imagination and intelligence to ask the right questions.
And ALL that has nothing to do with the latest Google Updates.
These are 2 dooms day scenario you guys are conjecturing together.
And over a decade ago I told you guys to get off Google's tits, so... Why did you guys wait so long? Path of least resistance.
I guarantee you that if you looked at your backlinks you'll magically find those toxic zero traffic links from scrapers and spammy link in them. I can bet my first born on that.
And there is the other side of "A.I." with blackhats going nuts with A.I. content, and winning RIGHT NOW. What's the difference with their domains and yours? Their domains are brand new, with no toxic backlinks.
Come on guys, it's starting to get a bit much.
Even John's trolling ya:
He told me to just go as lean as possible to survive.
"...there have been zero recoveries from the HCU and its predecessor YMYL/EEAT"
I was quoting Ryuzaki.You guys aren't paying attention to what has been posted, clearly.
This site wasn't hit by the HCU, which (besides December 2022) rolled out on September 14th, 2023 and finished before month's end. It appears to have been caught in the gray area of the tail end (took 26 days to roll out) of the November 2023 Core Update (not Reviews Update), which is why it popped back slightly after, and why it popped back in the March 2024 Core Update.
That graph is all over the show. Not a good example
You guys aren't paying attention to what has been posted, clearly.
I give up.
Not me... recovery is imminent.cull the population
Now, this tells me Google has made a HUGE change in the way they evaluate on-site. How? I have no clue. I am currently doing other experiments, but for me the content at the moment is equally important as the links. If not more.
- First-Person Pronouns: The use of first-person pronouns (I, me, my, we, us, our) is a strong indicator that the writer is sharing personal experiences or opinions.
- Narrative Style: Text that includes narratives or anecdotes, especially those detailing specific events, dates, locations, or personal interactions, suggests firsthand experience.
- Detailed Descriptions: Detailed descriptions of sensory experiences (sights, sounds, smells), emotions, or thoughts can imply personal involvement.
- Temporal References: References to specific times or periods ("last year", "when I was in college") in relation to the topic might indicate personal experience.
- Direct Speech: Use of direct speech or quoted dialogue can be a sign of personal recounting of conversations or interactions.
- Expertise Indicators: Phrases like "in my experience", "I have found", or "as someone who has" suggest that the writer is drawing from personal knowledge or professional experience related to the topic.
- Emotional Language: Emotional or evaluative language that reflects personal feelings (happy, sad, frustrating, rewarding) about the topic could indicate personal experience.
- Unique or Insider Knowledge: Mention of details not widely known or that are typically only understood by someone with direct experience might signal personal involvement.
- Contrast with General Knowledge: Content that contrasts personal views or experiences with widely accepted facts or general public opinion can highlight personal experience.
- Causality and Personal Consequence: Texts where the writer discusses personal changes or consequences as a result of engaging with the topic suggest direct involvement.
Almost 10 days later... how are you trending?The shake-up seems to have begun stabilizing on 4/13 recovering lost rankings. Dare I say it'll probably finish soon.
Feels...I give up.
I'm half way through that webcast of MyFitFriend and I think you're right. From comparing the sites that rank in my niche now, it must be backlinks that rank. The sites that do rank are those shit ones from 15 years ago that did no SEO at all for 15 years. Now they're ranking with 59 backlinks since everyone else got penalized for doing SEO! ha! Good find!Feels...
https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-men-who-killed-google/I must say Google under Pichai and this guy Raghavan, who I hadn't heard about, do seem to have taken the company in an entirely different direction. I don't think Page and Brin can be involved at all.
The overall feel I get is Google just turning into any other bottomline company, caring more about quarterly nets than growing through innovation. The question is if they're looking to become Microsoft or Yahoo. I feel as if they hugely overestimate the quality of their search engine now. Even Elon Musk complained publicly now. People are saying Bing is better and for many searches, I honestly agree.