- Joined
- Mar 27, 2015
- Messages
- 837
- Likes
- 1,486
- Degree
- 3
Wow. Congrats.
No focus on building backlinks, all pure content.
I wonderd about this churning out content thing.
Do you think pages with longer content are better?
ie:
400 words vs 1k words vs 10k words
Same level of quality.
Does search value more words?
Do you get a lower bounce rate on a particular one?
Does user retention go higher with one?
Also do you think this can work for building a brand? I did this for a store once to help them generate traffic.
This is purely my experience so take it for what you will.
My best performing articles were all 2,000 words+ so yes it would appear search values longer content. I think this is largely due to how many long tails you can pick up in a longer article.
My bounce rates were always 85%+ lol. I think it is widely misunderstood metric.
My sites were informational so when someone found what they were looking for they left. Therefore I had a high bounce rate.
The real metric for me to look at and what I think Google looks at is returning visitors. All three sites had about 30-40% repeat visitors because the content was good. Who would keep visiting a website if it was absolute shit?
I think Google sees this, alongside branded searches as a major positive indicator of quality.
This question isn't about niche or topic.
But what were these sites?
Are they sites like news sites, how to sites, Amazon sites ( Im thinking now since you didn't monetize that way )? Im not wanting to know the niche, just what "style" or "kind" of site it was just for reference.
That is, if you can allude to it.
All I will say is that they were information based sites that provided useful content to readers. Not how-tos necessarily - more interest based content.
If your strategy is built around uploading a lot of content, why do you spread the content across multiple sites instead of one?
In other words why do you start multiple sites? Is it because you find that all of your sites have a saturation point in terms of content or is it because you don’t know which site is a winner until much later and you want to diversify to improve your chances?
If you have a winning site that is growing, would you still start another site?
To mitigate risk and because I can.
Once I am maxing out content production for one site and I have three writers sitting on their hands it makes sense to scale to other websites.
I am always looking to spread to other sites and niches once I feel that I am reaching max capacity on content volume for a particular site.
This approach doesnt make sense if you are a noob with $5 in the bank but I look at the money coming into my account and think how can I use this best to make more money.
More often than not that means more content, which I view as an investment.