Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The trend is to hire a marine biologist and leverage their LinkedIn/certification/name for your content. Of course, that content is still being written in East-Asia for $0.02 per word.I am against the increasing use of "experts" in everything though. Like with so many people and their mediocre university degrees that it sort of becomes that you can't make a site about fishing unless you were a marine biologist.
Try this and check the results and the dates:https://www.google.com/search?q=how+many+tails+a+cat+has
Though one good thing about this. There is no way they will keep it like this, as it is a huge mess now it seems.
The trend is to hire a marine biologist and leverage their LinkedIn/certification/name for your content. Of course, that content is still being written in East-Asia for $0.02 per word.
I'm not sure this is helpful for anyone.
Wtf. It looks like the kind of results you find on page 20-30 of Google SERPs just above those Chinese/Korean directory sites
Does anyone have an example of a search result that's impactful? Financial advice? Fitness? Something promoting feeding chocolate to dogs? Or is it all obscure searches from content designed to be deceitful?
OK, I'll bite ))No.
Honestly I have yet to see a site impacted that were not easy to spot simple problems. Most SEOs complaining seem to put in the least effort possible, it's always swiss cheese when you point out obvious flaws in their armor.
Shots Fired. Come At Me Bro.
This website is fairly professional-looking.
Give me a serious challenge next time.
Ok backlink profile
BankBonus.com has 2,200 pages indexed, but only about 78 pages generating traffic from Google. How do I know that, at SERPWoo we only monitor URLs that have at some point entered the top 30 results for keywords within Google.
To give a comparison MontlyFool's domain has 561,000 indexed pages, 49,643 pages which are have at some point hit the top 30 results of Google and we start automatically monitoring. So about 8-10% of their pages drive their SEO traffic - sounds about right if you do the 80/20 rule.
The BankBonus.com domain is at 3.5%.
I agree completely. This should be the goal. Not building sites in niches where you have zero relevance/expertise. Instead, niche down where you actually have experience and be THE leader.Niche down. Be THE expert.
Again, completely agree with this...What you'd have wanted with Bankbonus.com was to absolutely dominate that space. Instead of posting unrelated content like "How Long Does It Take For A Check To Clear?" and "Are Banks Open Today?", you'd focus strictly on winning each and every bank bonus keyword.
There is absolute ZERO social presences for this brand. NONE.
It's a 2 year old domain - why would they be considered experts?
2,200 pages indexed, but only about 78 pages generating traffic from Google
1. Those "bank bonus" keywords are highly commercial and therefore highly competitive. So, if they only targeted the "bank bonus" keywords, they probably wouldn't break through page two on Google.
2. Let's pretend the competition isn't an issue. What about topical/niche authority? Do you think Google would have awarded all of the "bank bonus" keywords to a site that doesn't have any authority in banking?
3. I'm not advocating the approach but I'm guessing all the "How long does it take for a check to clear?" and "Are banks open today?" articles are low competition and may have been part of a bigger strategy (e.g. a variation of Avalanche) where they're trying to build up a base of content to show Google they can (or could) write and rank in the banking space.
I have no authority, no social profiles, less than 50 articles, and Im competing against some of the largest names in the space.
If you know how to rank, it much easier to match and exceed, get it up, rank and bank
I see all my "Video outside viewbox" pages have been completely de-ranked. Like they don't show up at all in the top 100 for the target keyword (90% of them was #1 before last update).
I know there's no simple answer... But, how long does a site need to be around for you to think "Okay, they've been around long enough to be seen as an authority." Is it 5 years, 10 years, more?
I want this to be crystal clear.
CRYSTAL CLEAR.
IF you are going down the "ONLY SEO" route, there is no way to rank with simple SEO in 2023 without presences on social media platforms or having other traffic sources.
We have arrived at the end of days for the "just SEO" game. There is no way you can play this game without going down black or grey hat methods for just "pure SEO".
So if you are going down a pure white hat strategy, you better have additional marketing channels generating you traffic sources because that is NOW an absolute factor.
We have arrived at the end of days for the "just SEO" game. There is no way you can play this game without going down black or grey hat methods for just "pure SEO".
I know there's no simple answer... But, how long does a site need to be around for you to think "Okay, they've been around long enough to be seen as an authority." Is it 5 years, 10 years, more?