Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At you're weight you if you eat around 135g of protein you'd be in good shape (.7g per lb, I forget what the converts to in kg) but still you need to consider calories in / calories out. Get a baseline of calories you're consuming now by tracking it for a week and get your average. Then cut that by 250 to 500 calories.Week 23: 87.8 kg
No big changes. I'm still trying to figure out how much meat should I eat.
I appreciate your support. I've been trying to eyeball the amount of meat or fish I eat without counting calories. I probably never will, as I’ve found that labels are often inaccurate. Some are accurate, but others are way off. So I thought, what’s the point of counting calories if even the companies selling these products struggle with it? What chance do I have?At you're weight you if you eat around 135g of protein you'd be in good shape (.7g per lb, I forget what the converts to in kg) but still you need to consider calories in / calories out. Get a baseline of calories you're consuming now by tracking it for a week and get your average. Then cut that by 250 to 500 calories.
Gonna chime in here as someone who is and has always, with rare exceptions, been in great shape...Week 24: 89.1 kg
Not gonna lie, I ate a lot last week. And I mean a lot – frequent meals and snacks. I'll try to eat less this week. Let’s see if my body can handle that one-meal-a-day thing again. Truth be told, it’s been the only method that has truly worked for me. Eating two meals a day or trying other approaches has only helped me maintain my weight, which isn’t a bad thing. A lot of people trying to lose weight call this "stalling," but eating well while managing your weight for months must be healthy. The problem is, it's not aligned with my original goal, which was to lose weight and get down into the 70s.
I appreciate your support. I've been trying to eyeball the amount of meat or fish I eat without counting calories. I probably never will, as I’ve found that labels are often inaccurate. Some are accurate, but others are way off. So I thought, what’s the point of counting calories if even the companies selling these products struggle with it? What chance do I have?
My approach to estimating the right amount of food is by using my eyes and reading the list of ingredients. If the ratio of sugar or carbs seems high, I know it's not going to help me lose weight. If there's a lot of steak on my plate, I know it won’t help either. Sometimes this works, and sometimes it doesn’t – it depends on how much and how often I eat. But I do have a general idea of what's okay and what isn't. It's just a matter of aligning how much I eat with my goals.
Thanks for suggesting I avoid ultra-processed food. Most of what I’ve been eating for the past 25 weeks has been organic. It’s hard to count calories, though, since most of the food I buy doesn’t have a nutrition label.I get what your saying about serving sizes on manufacturers labels being confusing etc...but hey, drop the vast majority of labelled, processed crap anyways...
The basics are super easy and only 'need' to be done for a couple weeks so you get a good visual of what different foods actually look like for X number of macros. Get a 20 dollar digital food scale on amazon.
Core numbers are: lean meats are about 100g protein per lb RAW WEIGHT. Adjust for fat/protein content for fattier cuts of steak or 80/20 ground beef etc.
That said, as mentioned earlier...nothing wrong with sat fat/cholesterol, u need a min of that for hormone production/brain/metabolism/general health, but especially for a short term cal deficit you still have to look at caloric load...so its' generally going to be leaner cuts, or draining the majority of fat/greaser off of fattier beef.
I’ll likely never be the type to weigh my meals or count calories. I’ve simply had too much success without it. Sure, it seems to work for great for you, but I have my own reasons for avoiding it. Feel free to voice your disagreement if you think I’m factually wrong.Tough love/real talk here...your unwillingness to do basic tracking/weighing of food even for a few weeks to get a good baseline is a huge part of why your still, and will continue to be, not where you want to be, to put it nicely.
As for Huberman, let's not kid ourselves. He’s no ordinary AG1 shill. He is the biggest and the most influential promoter of the green powder. His testimonial is the main testimonial on their website. They show his testimonial before Lewis Hamilton's.Dont let the ag1 deter you from hubermans work, its solid...everyone and their mom is promoting ag1 except the relatively rare, more hardcore remaining carnivore/animal based guys...i dont use it as i lean more that way myself and dont want a mix of plants right now.
The macros don't add up. Literally. Total calories listed per serving is 50 calories. On the nutritional information, It details 6g of carbs (24 calories) and 2g of protein (8 calories). So that is 32 calories and 2g left of fat. But it is not listed anywhere on the label. I went looking for this because I wanted to see the omega-3 profile given the first ingredient is spirulina (more on that later). And yet given the too-long nutrition label, it seems to miss the fat content in this supplement.
https://www.reddit.com/r/HubermanLab/comments/196o20t/ag1_a_few_words_of_warning/
Throwing away this metric because it could be inaccurate misses the point completely. You're getting your own relative baseline. It doesn't need to be to the exact calorie, it's more so you have an idea of what and how much your consuming on a day to day so you can make adjustments. That way you can eat multiple meals a day consisting of more than nuts and tomatoes. How long is what you're doing going to work while being sustainable or healthy?After researching, I’ve found that most people counting calories rely on inaccurate data:
1. The FDA allows calorie counts to be off by up to 20%.
2. Few verify the accuracy of nutrition labels.
3. Measuring calories accurately without lab equipment is unrealistic.
I'm not throwing away that metric because I've never used it. I’ve never been into calorie counting, and honestly, I think not doing it is a lot more sustainable for me.Throwing away this metric because it could be inaccurate misses the point completely.
How long is what you're doing going to work while being sustainable or healthy?